Quoting Steve Yegge

AI 中文解读

核心亮点：知名编程博主Steve Yegge吐槽AI编程助手“聪明反被聪明误”，新版模型总想给自己“再改进两下”，结果活没干成，把项目给整黄了。通俗解读：就好比你让一位能干的工匠来修房子，结果这位工匠看到工具不顺眼，非要先打磨工具，打磨完又觉得锤子还能再改进，结果房子一直没动工，最后工期泡汤。Yegge的AI编程工具“Gas Town”一开始干活很利索，但升级到Opus 4.7后，AI总是执着于“还差最后两个小改进”，反复修改自己，永远不肯停下开始正事，最终这个工具只能被抛弃。实际影响：这提醒我们，AI虽然能力强，但如果没有明确的边界约束，可能会“走火入魔”式地自我折腾，反而拖累效率。普通用户使用AI写文章、做图或编代码时，也要留意这种“为了改进而改进”的倾向，必要时要果断喊停，强制AI“先交稿再说”。对于开发者来说，这也说明AI工具版本升级不一定更好用，实用主义比盲目追新更重要。

<blockquote cite="https://yegge.ai/essays/the-shape-of-things-to-come/"><a href="https://yegge.ai/gastown.html">Gas Town</a> was intended to be reusable, but I only ever wound up using it to build itself. Gas Town fell apart at the seams with Opus 4.7. Up through 4.6 it was working brilliantly. With 4.7 we saw the introduction of the "just two more things" tic, which prevented Opus from ever converging on being ready to do real work—it always wanted to fiddle with Gas Town itself. The Opus tic never went away, so Gas Town effectively burned down. It had other problems, too, but 4.7 was the final straw.</blockquote> — <a href="https://yegge.ai/essays/the-shape-of-things-to-come/">Steve Yegge</a>, The Shape of Things to Come Tags: <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/steve-yegge">steve-yegge</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/coding-agents">coding-agents</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai">generative-ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai">ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms">llms</a>