Daily Tech Briefing
AI 科技速览
每天 5 分钟内学习 AI。获取最新的人工智能新闻,理解其重要性,并学习如何将其应用于您的工作。
CNBC AI · 2026/8/3 20:57:02

Twenty five states sue Trump administration over latest global tariffs
AI 中文解读
**25个州联合起诉特朗普政府:关税大战再掀法律风暴**
核心亮点:美国25个民主党主导的州联手把特朗普政府告上法庭,直指总统绕开最高法院裁决、擅自加征进口关税的做法违法。
通俗解读:特朗普政府想对来自60个贸易伙伴的商品加征10%或12.5%的关税,但这套做法被最高法院和国际贸易法院否了。现在各州认为,总统拿贸易法里的老条款当“挡箭牌”,换了个名目继续强推被否决的政策,属于“换个马甲再上场”,法律上站不住脚。
实际影响:这事看着是政治纠纷,其实跟普通人的钱包直接挂钩。如果关税落地,进口商品成本上升,超市里的日用品、电子产品、汽车零件都可能跟着涨价。25个州联合起诉,说明不满情绪非常广,官司一旦打赢,关税可能被叫停,已交的税款还要退还。这意味着未来的物价走势、企业进货成本,甚至就业市场都会受到连锁影响。法律拉锯战才刚开场,消费者能做的,就是先捂紧钱包,观望事态发展。
Skip NavigationMarketsPre-MarketsU.S. MarketsCurrenciesPrediction MarketsCryptocurrencyFutures & CommoditiesBondsFunds & ETFsBusinessEconomyFinanceHealth & ScienceMediaReal EstateEnergyClimateTransportationInvestigationsIndustrialsRetailWealthSportsLifeSmall BusinessInvestingPersonal FinanceFintechFinancial AdvisorsOptions ActionETF StreetBuffett ArchiveEarningsTrader TalkTechCybersecurityAIEnterpriseInternetMediaMobileSocial MediaCNBC Disruptor 50Tech GuidePolitics & PolicyWhite HousePolicyDefenseCongressExpanding OpportunityVideoLatest VideoFull EpisodesLivestreamLive AudioLive TV ScheduleCNBC PodcastsCEO InterviewsCNBC DocumentariesDigital OriginalsWatchlistInvesting ClubTrust PortfolioAnalysisTrade AlertsMeeting VideosHomestretchJim's ColumnsEducationSubscribePROPro NewsJosh BrownMike SantoliCalls of the DayMy PortfolioLivestreamFull EpisodesStock ScreenerMarket ForecastOptions InvestingChart InvestingSubscribeLivestreamMenuMake ItselectUSAINTLLivestreamSearch quotes, news & videosLivestreamWatchlistSIGN INCreate free accountMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPolitics & PolicyVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenu
(function() {
const userMembershipOnLastVisit = localStorage.getItem("cnbcMeta__cachedUserMembership");
if (!userMembershipOnLastVisit) {
// If no user membership is stored, user is likely not logged in.
// These users will typically see the banner.
return;
}
const { isPro, isInvestingClubUser } = JSON.parse(userMembershipOnLastVisit);
if (!(isPro || isInvestingClubUser)) {
// We’re rendering the top banner for users who are not pro or investing club members.
return;
}
// Hide the banner for pro and investing club users.
const style = document.createElement("style");
style.id = "top-banner-placeholder-style";
style.innerHTML = "[data-top-banner-placeholder] { display: none; }";
document.head.appendChild(style);
})()
Politics & PolicyTwenty five states sue Trump administration over latest global tariffsPublished Mon, Aug 3 20263:44 PM EDTUpdated Mon, Aug 3 20264:57 PM EDTLuke Fountain@Luke_Fountain25WATCH LIVEKey PointsA coalition of 25 Democratic-led states sued the Trump administration Monday over tariffs of 10% or 12.5% on goods from 60 trading partners.The states argue that the administration used Section 301 of the Trade Act to replace sweeping tariffs already rejected by the Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of International Trade.The lawsuit asks the court to block and overturn the tariffs and refund duties paid by the states.People watch as the Doris Ocean container ship departs from the Port of Los Angeles, in Los Angeles, May 28, 2026.Mario Tama | Getty ImagesA coalition of 25 Democratic-led states sued the Trump administration Monday, arguing President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping tariffs on goods from 60 U.S. trading partners.The complaint, filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, challenges tariffs of 10% or 12.5% on most goods imported from the affected economies, which together account for 99.4% of U.S. imports, according to the states.The states are asking the court to halt the tariffs, declare them unlawful and order refunds of duties they have paid. "After losing at the Supreme Court, the administration is once again trying to illegally raise taxes on families and businesses with a new round of tariffs," New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.At the center of the case is the administration's effort to preserve Trump's broad tariff regime after courts rejected two earlier versions imposed under different laws. The states argue officials seized on Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and forced-labor concerns as a pretext to rapidly recreate nearly identical global duties.The White House rejected that argument."The U
分享
阅读原文 ↗