Daily Tech Briefing
AI 科技速览

每天 5 分钟内学习 AI。获取最新的人工智能新闻,理解其重要性,并学习如何将其应用于您的工作。

AI 快讯
Wired AI · 2026/7/28 10:30:00
Can the New York Times Save Journalism From

Can the New York Times Save Journalism From

AI 中文解读
核心亮点:《纽约时报》不惜花费超2000万美元,起诉OpenAI和微软侵犯版权,只为捍卫新闻业的生存底线。 通俗解读:简单来说,纽约时报发现AI公司偷偷拿自家记者辛辛苦苦写的文章去训练聊天机器人,却一分钱没给。出版人苏兹伯格认为,这样下去,未来谁还愿意花钱雇人做深度调查?新闻就会被AI直接“吃掉”,变成没有灵魂的拼凑内容。所以他把科技巨头告上法庭,哪怕官司输赢难料,也要为行业争个规矩。更麻烦的是,特朗普政府也在打压媒体,一边被总统刁难,一边被AI颠覆,新闻业正腹背受敌。 实际影响:如果你平时用AI搜新闻、看摘要,那这场官司的结果会直接影响你看到的内容质量。如果法院支持纽约时报,AI公司以后就得更规矩地付费使用媒体内容,或许未来用AI问“今天头条”时,系统会直接显示来自正规媒体的付费摘要。反之,原创报道可能越来越少,你看到的信息将充满机器拼凑的“二手货”,真假难辨。总之,这事关你我每天看到的是可靠新闻还是AI的“包装垃圾”。
Katie DrummondBusinessJul 28, 2026 6:30 AMCan the New York Times Save Journalism From Our AI Overlords?In 2023, the Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. They’ve since spent more than $20 million on the case, and publisher A.G. Sulzberger has no plans to stop fighting it.Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty ImagesCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyFor most companies, spending upwards of $20 million on a single legal fight with an uncertain outcome might mean the boss has some explaining to do. For A.G. Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times, that explanation is simple: It’s the cost of defending journalism—at the Times and everywhere else.Sulzberger, who took on the publisher role about a decade ago and has been an influential leader in the Times’ much-lauded push into digital innovation, has no shortage of defending to do lately. Nearly three years ago, the Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging that the companies illegally used New York Times journalism to train AI models. That legal case, in which motions are still being filed about discovery requests, is only one front in a broader battle: The Trump administration is waging an ongoing war on press freedoms—most recently with an outrageous attempt to subpoena Times journalists over coverage of the president’s Qatar-gifted jet to be used as Air Force One—while AI companies radically reshape the way people find and consume information online.The Times has arguably never been stronger as a business, having recently surpassed 13 million subscribers, and its newsroom is widely seen among journalists as one of the most stable and well-resourced in the business. Still, Sulzberger believes that journalism itself is facing myriad existential dilemmas—from an administration ready and willing to target reporters, from AI companies whose products depend on the very reporting they risk undermining, and media companies being demolished by the changes they’re unleashing on the open web.I sat down with Sulzberger in late July at WIRED’s offices. We talked about that Times lawsuit, how and where AI is transforming reporting inside the newsroom, and why he thinks journalists and media executives need to team up—even while they continue to compete fiercely. You can read our entire conversation below, or listen to it here.This interview has been edited for length and clarity.KATIE DRUMMOND: AG, welcome. Thank you for being here.A.G. SULZBERGER: It's great to be here. Thanks for inviting me.I want to get into AI, and I will, but I would be a terrible journalist if I didn't start with news that has recently affected your paper.Specifically, I'm talking about the subpoenas that the Justice Department has issued to several Times journalists about their reporting on the Air Force One jet that was gifted to the Trump administration by Qatar. The Justice Department also issued subpoenas to third-party phone service providers to obtain text messages and phone calls between some of those journalists and their family members.Thanks for starting there, because it’s obviously yet another disturbing escalation in the Trump administration's efforts to punish and undermine the free press in this country.First I should say, I have so much admiration for the reporters who have done this work and who are doing it under a different kind of pressure than we have seen in generations. I think that by any objective metric, this is the biggest effort to go after the press that we've seen from a White House probably since Woodrow Wilson, so in more than a century.These reporters just continued, day after day, to put their heads down, right? Not to get baited by the folks booing them or the folks cheering them on, and just to do their work. That work includes reporting things that the President of the United States doesn't want the public to know because it may be unflattering or embarrassing.In this case, they repor
分享
阅读原文