Daily Tech Briefing
AI 科技速览

每天 5 分钟内学习 AI。获取最新的人工智能新闻,理解其重要性,并学习如何将其应用于您的工作。

AI 快讯
NVIDIA Blog · 2026/7/27 09:00:07

Industry Leaders Unite in Open Secure AI Alliance for AI Safety and Security

AI 中文解读
核心亮点:全球科技巨头联手成立开放安全AI联盟,用开源方式为AI系统打造一把人人可用的“安全盾牌”。 通俗解读:就像计算机的开源软件让无数开发者能检查漏洞、改进功能一样,这个新联盟要把AI安全工具也做成“公开配方”。过去,如果黑客攻击AI系统,防御方只能用少数几家公司的“黑盒”软件,反应慢、限制多。现在,英伟达、微软、IBM等几十家公司决定把防护工具开源,让任何机构都能自由查看、修改和使用。这好比把救火车的设计图公开,消防队可以自己改装出最适合本地火情的车辆,而不是只能买固定型号。 实际影响:对我们普通人来说,以后用AI聊天、刷脸支付或使用智能客服时,背后的安全防线会更透明、更灵活。企业也能避免被单一安全系统“卡脖子”,即使某个软件出问题,还有开源方案顶上。比如上次Hugging Face平台遭入侵,正是靠开源的AI模型在自己服务器上分析数据才及时止损。这个联盟落地后,我们日常依赖的云服务、银行App、政府网站都会多一层可信任的“社区联防”,发生数据泄露的概率更低。
Open source software is a critical pillar of the global economy. It underpins cloud computing, financial services, manufacturing, telecommunications, government and internet services by making technology accessible and observable to communities of experts.  Cybersecurity is among the top three beneficiaries of open source software. The Open Secure AI Alliance — building on the leadership of the Linux Foundation’s Akrites initiative and OpenSSF community work — will work to remediate and disclose vulnerabilities using open technologies.  Just as open source created a shared foundation for software, the United States and its partners now face a choice in AI security: whether the defenses that protect our infrastructure will sit inside a few opaque systems or be built on open models, harnesses and tools that any defender can study, adapt and deploy. The world needs both closed and open models. For cybersecurity, open models and open harnesses are essential because they democratize defensive capabilities, increase transparency for defenders, enable cyber defense while protecting data, and complement frontier closed models with customizable, localized controls. Open source enables massively distributed community-driven and self-controlled defense – with no single point of failure.  Open models, like any powerful technology, can be misused — including through attempts to weaken safeguards or repurpose capabilities for cyber attacks — but those risks are not unique to open systems, and they must be managed wherever advanced AI is deployed. The recent Hugging Face security incident delivered a clear reminder: cyber defenders need open, frontier agentic systems for self-defense. When closed AI tools — unable to distinguish attackers from defenders — blocked essential forensic analysis, Hugging Face ran the open-weight GLM 5.2 model on its own infrastructure to analyze more than 17,000 actions and contain the intrusion.   That incident showed a practical truth: when defenders cannot inspect, adapt and run advanced AI on their own infrastructure, their ability to respond is constrained at exactly the moment speed matters most. Companies and countries need open frontier defensive tools and techniques so critical industries can build security systems across a multi-vendor ecosystem and avoid single points of failure. That is the mission of the Open Secure AI Alliance: to ensure defenders everywhere have open, frontier tools they can trust and control. Leaders across cloud computing, cybersecurity, enterprise software, open source foundations and AI research — including NVIDIA, Adobe, Cadence, Capital One, Cisco, Cloudera, Cloudflare, Cognition, CrowdStrike, Databricks, Dell Technologies, DoorDash, Elastic, HPE, Hugging Face, IBM, LangChain, the Linux Foundation, Microsoft, NAVER, NetApp, Nous Research, OpenClaw, Palantir, Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat, Reflection AI, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Siemens, SK Telecom, Snowflake, SpacexAI, Synopsys, Thinking Machines Lab and TrendAI are inaugural partners in the Open Secure AI Alliance, a movement to develop and share open technologies, techniques and tools to safeguard software and agents in the age of AI. Some argue that open models are inherently less safe because they can be misused for cyberattacks or modified to remove guardrails. Those risks are real, but they do not disappear in closed systems, and simply keeping weights closed does not prevent determined attackers from seeking or exploiting powerful AI. The right response is not to deny defenders access to capable open systems. It is to pair openness with strong safeguards, clear rules against malicious misuse, rigorous evaluation and rapid remediation. In cybersecurity, the safer path is the one that gives more defenders the ability to test, verify and strengthen the systems on which society relies.  Defenders need both frontier closed models and frontier open models, working together, so they can choose the right system for the job a
分享
阅读原文