Daily Tech Briefing
AI 科技速览
每天 5 分钟内学习 AI。获取最新的人工智能新闻,理解其重要性,并学习如何将其应用于您的工作。
SiliconANGLE AI · 2026/7/21 15:00:25

Google expands Gemini with cheaper models and a bug-hunter it keeps on a leash
AI 中文解读
谷歌今天一口气推出三款新的Gemini Flash模型,还把自动找漏洞的代码安全助手CodeMender开放预览,核心思路就是让AI跑得更便宜、更智能。其中最引人注目的Gemini 3.6 Flash,处理复杂任务时能省下近17%的计算量,速度比上一代快12%,价格反而更低——每百万输入词只收1.5美元。简单说,以前用AI写代码、分析文档要花不少钱,现在门槛降了,效果还更好。谷歌还专门给政府和可信机构准备了一款安全特化版模型,用来防御网络攻击。这对普通人的影响:你用的各种AI应用(比如法律文书生成、金融报告分析)会响应更快、错误更少,背后成本降低也可能让免费服务的上限提高。而CodeMender这类自动修Bug的AI,能让软件漏洞更快被修补,大家日常用的App会更安全。总的来说,谷歌正在把AI变成更便宜、更可靠的生产力工具。
UPDATED 11:00 EDT / JULY 21 2026
AI
Google expands Gemini with cheaper models and a bug-hunter it keeps on a leash
by
Duncan Riley
Google LLC today launched three new Gemini Flash models and moved its CodeMender code-security agent into preview, part of a push to run artificial intelligence agents more cheaply and to automate the finding and fixing of software vulnerabilities.
The new models are Gemini 3.6 Flash, an updated version of the workhorse model Google positions for coding and knowledge work; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, built for high-throughput tasks; and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, a security-tuned model the company is restricting to governments and trusted partners.
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the centerpiece. Google said it uses up to 17% fewer output tokens than the previous 3.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Index and takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete multistep jobs. It’s priced at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens, below the cost of 3.5 Flash.
The company reported gains across coding and knowledge benchmarks. It put the model at 49% on DeepSWE against 37% for 3.5 Flash, at 63.9% on the MLE Bench measure of machine-learning research against 49.7%, and at 83% on the OSWorld-Verified test of computer use against 78.4%. Computer use is now a built-in tool in the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise. On GDPval-AA v2, a benchmark for knowledge work, Google scored the model at 1421 against 1349.
Early customers include legal AI company Harvey AI Corp. and financial research platform Hebbia Inc., which Google said used the model for document parsing, data analysis and report drafting.
“Gemini 3.6 Flash excels at document drafting and review in practice areas like capital markets and corporate M&A,” Niko Grupen, head of applied research at Harvey, said in a testimonial provided by Google. “Compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.6 Flash showed strong gains in performance on our benchmarks and was notably more efficient, completing tasks 12% faster on average.”
Google said 3.6 Flash ships with expanded Frontier Safety safeguards covering chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear risks and cyber offense and has been trained to resist jailbreaks while cutting refusals of benign requests.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is the cheapest and fastest of the three. Priced at 30 cents per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, it delivers the highest throughput of the 3.5 series, according to Artificial Analysis. Google said it significantly outperforms the earlier 3.1 Flash-Lite on tests, including Terminal-Bench 2.1. On some coding and agentic evals such as SWE-Bench Pro and OSWorld-Verified, it beats the larger 3 Flash. The company is positioning it as a migration path for workloads running on its 2.5 and 3 Flash models and is rolling it out in Google Search.
The third model is aimed squarely at security. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is fine-tuned to find, validate and patch software vulnerabilities and runs inside CodeMender. Google said that when CodeMender calls the model up to five times to produce a single report, it reaches competitive performance against much larger models on the CyberGym benchmark.
In testing by Google DeepMind’s Big Sleep team on complex codebases such as Chrome and Safari, the company said Flash Cyber outperformed its own 3.5 Flash and 3.6 Flash models as well as Anthropic PBC’s Claude Opus 4.6. On the V8 JavaScript engine, Google said the model found 55 unique confirmed issues, compared with 47 for 3.5 Flash and 36 for Claude Opus 4.6, including 10 that no other model caught. Google said it benchmarked against Claude Opus 4.6 rather than newer competitor mode
分享
阅读原文 ↗